CDF Calorimeter Simulation

Group presentations:
Various plots:




E/p gjtc0d vs. pydj000 (5.3.3_nt)
Status: July 18th, 2005:
Data: 9M JETCALIB events.
MC: 3M events
Plug part: IO tracks only.
E/p (eta) E/p (itow) central wall crack plug beam 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Status: June 27th, 2005:
Plug/beam part: SISA and IO tracks.
E/p (eta) E/p (itow) central wall crack plug beam 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Status: June 11th 2005 (obsolete): plug
E/p gjtc0d vs. FakeEv (5.3.3_nt)
Status: July 7th, 2005:
Data: full JETCALIB statistics (~16M events);
MC: ~10M events; single particle response weighted with data track spectrum (except for towers 0 and 5); flavor composition 60% pions, 30% kaons, 10% protons;
E/p (eta) E/p (itow) central wall crack plug beam 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Status: July 2nd, 2005:
Data: ~9M JETCALIB events;
MC: ~10M events; single particle response weighted with data track spectrum (except for towers 0 and 5); flavor composition 60% pions, 30% kaons, 10% protons;
E/p (eta) E/p (itow) central wall crack plug beam 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Status: June 26th, 2005:
Data: ~8M JETCALIB events;
MC: ~12M events; single pion response weighted with data track spectrum (except for towers 0 and 5); no flavor mixture;
E/p (eta) E/p (itow) central wall crack plug beam 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Status: June 11th, 2005 (obsolete): central

Pedro Movilla Fernandez
Last modified: Wed Oct 4 19:15:54 PDT 2006
[Back]