Jason summarized some ideas that we have discussed recently for WH 
improvements. Since he is going to graduate soon, he would be happy to help 
anyone up to speed for the next around analysis. 

In general, try to reproduce the summary results as soon as possible before 
doing any serious analysis. It's very important to use the same selections and 
cuts. So, we can move forward from where we are right now. If you have any 
problems, you know where to seek the help.   

Short Term (possible for winters)
--------------------------------
* Improving isolated track selections for hadronic tau or electrons 

* Commissioning Roma tagger and understanding the impact for the higgs search.

* Improving the jet energy corrections and understanding its impact for the 
  higgs search 

* Improved multivariate techniques - Possibilities include
   new NN variables (orthogonal vars)
   new NN training (boosting, neurobayes)
   multivariate resolution improvements (jet res, met res)

* Continue to improve ME+BDT techniques.

* Lower the offline cut on high-pt lepton triggers from 20 to 18, apply 
turn on curve - llbb does this already, we can just ask.

* Including the W non-track trigger and phi-gap loose muon triggers. 

* MET45 trigger - Adrian has already made some progress demonstrating 
that we can get more acceptance using this trigger. What do the 
backgrounds look like? Can we handle the fakes here too? Do we know the 
cuts necessary to get the trigger efficiency to be a function of just MET?

Medium  and Long term (summer conferences)
------------------------------------------

* 3 jet bin - We tried to use the same techniques as the two-jet bin
and they didn't work out. Is there a new approach (cuts, multivariate?)
that can improve the situation? Why is the 3 jet bin harder? Is it just 
that the s/sqrt(b) is really poor? While this isn't necessarily new 
ground, it might be time to revisit it quickly and see if we can learn 
something new, like what s/sqrt(b) we need to see an improvement.

* Loose electrons - Can we expand isolated tracks to get some loose 
electrons? Can we develop a loose electron id? Is there a loose electron 
id that will work for the MET+2jets trigger? How about the W no track 
trigger? This is something that we haven't studied much, but some MC 
studies could help illuminate the way forward.

* "1.5 Jet Bin" - Is there a way we can add acceptance by looking at 
events with one tight jet (ET > 20) and one loose jet (12 < ET < 20)? 
Like loose ele's, we haven't studied this much, so some MC studies could 
help us decide how to go forward. An important question - do we 
understand b-tagging of loose jets? My first answer is yes, we do, 
because we measure or tag efficiency is a sample with lower Et than top. 
Another important question - does this interfere with our k-factor 
measurement?