PEM Face Response
Henri implemented the PEM face response function calculated from the
test beam. I just reposited the code as a static function in the Electron
package. This can be used both by the simulation to get the response
right, and by analysis jobs to correct the electron energy.
The next thing to do is convert the simulation code to use this
function. (Now it uses the equivalent code local in the Gflash package.)
- Before any changes, I got the following plots from Henri's script:
- Made the following changes:
- GflashCalResponse.cc was changed to use the new function from
the Electron package rather than GflashPEMFaceCorrector.
- A few bugs in the face response code were fixed, especially
to use some new information about which towers have
mirror-symmetric geometry relative to the main tower we use
for the map.
- An apparent bug in the extrapolation (passing the Bfield in kG
when it was expected in T) was fixed.
- After those changes:
- 4.4.0int2MOD
- Looks good. The change from two small red blotches to one big
red blotch is expected since this is a type 5 tower and we are
now modeling the fact that odd and even towers have
mirror-symmetric geometries (in phi). So the neighbor towers
have their peaks on the opposite side in phi.
- Mar 26, 2002:
Finally, after updating to 4.4.0int6, and adding GflashSim.cc from
the head (this includes Yoshiaki's changes for PPR simulation):
- 4.4.0int6PPR
- Well, the relative response part looks OK, so I'll reposit that,
but as you can see the overall response is much higher (?)
with the new version. I expect this has to do with the PPR
changes, and I'll have to look at how the PEM tuning is affected.
- Mar 29, 2002:
Actually, this is an obsolescence effect. The accessor
for EM energy which used to include just PEM energy now adds
in the PPR energy, so it's OK that the scale is higher now.
In fact, it's closer to unity in the center of the tower now,
so that's good.
Last modified: Fri Mar 29 19:03:48 PST 2002